Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Haverhill Electric Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 5, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

These are actions of tort wherein the plaintiffs seek to recover damages for personal injuries caused by an explosion in a manhole in a sidewalk on Merrimack Street, in Haverhill, containing electrical apparatus of the defendant. The plaintiffs were upon the sidewalk in proximity to the manhole when its cover was thrown up by the explosion, and they were injured. The defendant owned the manhole, and maintained and operated therein certain electrical wires and appliances, and two transformers. It was not contended that the manhole was illegally located in the sidewalk or that there was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ash v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Hecht v. Boston Wharf Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Kusick v. Thorndike & Hix, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Barrango v. Hinckley Rendering Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Curtin v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Economy Grocery Stores Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Shuman v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1936
  3. Washington Food Shop, Inc. v. S. M. Spencer Mfg. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Washington Food Shop, Inc. v. S. M. Spencer Mfg. Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API