Legal Opinion

Shreveport Long Leaf Lumber Co. v. Jones

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 27, 1936No. 33857PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

On the application of the relator for writs of certiorari and mandamus, we issued a rule nisi against the district judge, who was sued by the relator, to show cause why he should not be compelled to recuse himself and appoint another judge to try the case.

Respondent in his return denies that any motion to recuse himself ,and appoint a judge to try the case was ever served on him or called to his attention, except when relator notified him of its intention to apply to this court for writs. He excepted to the relator’s application on the grounds of prematurity and want of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Central Lumber Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shreveport Long Leaf Lumber Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API