Legal Opinion
Philippine Sugar Centrals Agency v. Mitsui Bussan Kaisha, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 19, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The first suit is for damage to a cargo’ of Philippine sugar carried on the ship Nagisan Maru. The second is for damage to a like cargo carried on the Shohei Maru. The two suits were tried together.
The Nagisan Maru.—This vessel took a cargo of sugar from Philippine ports early in December, 1932. , On discharge at New York fifty days later some of the bags were found to be heavily stained and wet. The stains were described as black and syrupy, of the appearance of molasses. There were 1,390 of such damaged bags, bearing the marks “B E” and “I S C,” out of 48,000 bags…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schnell v. the VallescuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Clark v. BarnwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- The FolminaSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- The RosaliaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Rich v. LambertSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Compania Generale de Tobacos de Filipinas v. Kokusai Kisen Kabushiki KaishaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
- The Naples MaruDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937