Legal Opinion

Louisville Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 10, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMMACK, Chief Justice.

From a judgment awarding damages to appellee for personal injuries, this appeal is prosecuted. Appellant contends that (1) it was entitled to peremptory instruction; and (2) there was error in instructions.

Appellee and another woman were attempting to cross to the north side of Broadway at Fourteenth Street in Louisville. Each of them testified as to the facts and circumstances of the accident. Appellee stated:

“We were standing — we were in the street, in the middle of the street waiting for the westbound .traffic to cross. We were right in the center, and we had to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dix v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  2. King v. . Interborough Rapid Transit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Pruett v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. RudyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  5. Brehony v. Pottsville Union Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamed v. County of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Eleonora Sitta, Administratrix of the Estate of Pasquale Vitucci, Deceased v. American Steel and Wire Division of United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  3. Hamed v. County of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API