Legal Opinion

Union Loan, Storage & Mercantile Co. v. Farbstein

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 19, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Eon. Geo. G. Eitchcoch, Judge. (1) The merits of the plaintiff’s case are not proper subjects of inquiry on a plea in abatement, and the plea in abatement must be determined before the other issues are tried. Jordan v. Railroad, 105 Mo. App. 446; Commission Co. v. Block, 130 Mo. 668; Chouteau v. Broughton, 100 Mo. 406; Sauerwein v. Champagne Co., 68 Mo.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Eon. Geo. G. Eitchcoch, Judge. (1) The merits of the plaintiff’s case are not proper subjects of inquiry on a plea in abatement, and the plea in abatement must be determined before the other issues are tried. Jordan v. Railroad, 105 Mo. App. 446; Commission Co. v. Block, 130 Mo. 668; Chouteau v. Broughton, 100 Mo. 406; Sauerwein v. Champagne Co., 68 Mo. App. 29; Byler v. Jones, 79 Mo. 261. (2) The court erred in admitting any evidence under the first count of respondent’s petition over the objection and exception of the appellant, because the first…

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, P. J.

(after stating, the facts). — The points relied on in the brief of counsel for appellant are: First, that the merits of the plaintiff’s case are not proper subjects of inquiry on a plea in abatement, and the plea in abatement must be determined before the *227other issues are tried; second, that the court erred in admitting any evidence under the first count of respondent’s petition, because the first count does not state a cause of action in that it fails to state that the defendant promised to pay, and that such allegation was necessary to constitute good pleading; third, that the court erred…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corby v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  2. Alkire Grocer Co. v. TagartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Hurck v. St. Louis Exposition & Music Hall Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Lustig v. CohenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. May, Weil & Co. v. KlossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Friedman Keller & Co. v. OlsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Danciger v. American Express Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Monroe v. United Railways Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Loyless v. RobertsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Meyerotto v. Estate of RommelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API