O'Hara v. Scranton City
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 261, Jan. T., 1902, by defendant, from order of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Sept. T., 1900, No. 619, dismissing exceptions to report of referee in case of Vincent H. O’Hara to use of Fleming & O’Hara v. City of Scranton. Exceptions to report of C. B. Little, Esq., referee. Newcomb, J., filed the following opinion: V. H. O’Hara, the plaintiff, brought suit against the city of Scranton in trespass, to the use of himself and another, as “ Fleming & O’Hara.”
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 261, Jan. T., 1902, by defendant, from order of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Sept. T., 1900, No. 619, dismissing exceptions to report of referee in case of Vincent H. O’Hara to use of Fleming & O’Hara v. City of Scranton. Exceptions to report of C. B. Little, Esq., referee. Newcomb, J., filed the following opinion: V. H. O’Hara, the plaintiff, brought suit against the city of Scranton in trespass, to the use of himself and another, as “ Fleming & O’Hara.” He declared for damages for the defendant’s breach of her contract with him for the construction of a sewer in the north end of the…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The assignments of error in this case have no merit that warrants discussion. They are all overruled and the judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the court below dismissing the exceptions to the report of the referee.
2Cited by16 opinions
- Nagle Engine & Boiler Works v. ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Town of Capitol Heights v. SteinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Miller v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Broad v. City of MoscowIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Dime Deposit & Discount Bank v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.