Bruno v. Bruno

Vivian Bruno (former wife) argues that the trial court erred by awarding her only durational alimony in the final judgment of *1274dissolution, without supporting, statutorily-required findings. She also contends the monthly amount of alimony is inadequate. We agree, and reverse and remand for further proceedings.

The parties had been married nine years when Robert Bruno, 79 years old in 2011, petitioned for dissolution. Each entered the marriage as a homeowner and each deeded undivided half-interests in their homes to the other. They lived in what had been the former husband’s house and sold what…