Legal Opinion
Sommer v. Monga
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided January 13, 1994No. 92-P-749PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFine, J.
Until D. Dev Monga sought to end the relationship, he and Paul F, Sommer were business associates, with interests in two corporations controlled by Monga. Sommer brought suit in the Superior Court against Monga and the two corporations alleging that the termination of the business relationship was a breach of contract and a breach of Monga’s fiduciary duty. Monga and the corporations filed counterclaims. A jury trial culminated in a judgment in Sommer’s favor against all three defendants in the amount of $478,904.03. Monga and the corporations appealed on July 11, 1991. Based upon occurrences…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sally Conforte v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Joseph Conforte v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- National Union of Marine Cooks & Stewards v. ArnoldSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Commonwealth v. AndrewsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Henderson v. HendersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tamber v. DesrochersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Sommer v. MaharajMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- L.F. v. L.J.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Sommer v. MaharajMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006