Legal Opinion

Faerber v. Nine Hundred & Sixty-nine Park Avenue Co.

New York City Court

Decided January 15, 1914Published

Motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.

This is a motion made by the defendant to set aside the verdict as rendered by the jury upon all the grounds stated in section 999 of the Code of Civil Procedure and for a new trial. The action was brought to recover damages for injuries received through the negligence and carelessness of the defendant and its agents arising out of the following facts, which are stated in substance: It appears that the defendant was the owner of the premises known as 969 Park avenue, New York city, which was a new building erected by the defendant, and which was almost completed and ready for occupancy by…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brugher v. . BuchtenkirchNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Piper v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Rohrbacher v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Grimmer v. . Tenement House DepartmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Kenney v. RhinelanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API