Legal Opinion

Billings v. Canney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Speed, J.) Proceedings to recover possession. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, O. J.»

In this case the owner of a lot in the city of Detroit seeks to recover possession from a party1 claiming to be tenant, but whose tenancy she denies.

The facts are that on June 3, 1884, the respondent, as *426party of the first part, entered into a written agreement with the complainant, as party of the second part, whereby he agreed to build and finish for her a stable on the lot in question for a stipulated price, he furnishing some of the materials, but she the major part. The stable was to be finished by July 1, 1884, and the complainant was to pay the respondent $200 for his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGrath v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Jackson v. DelacroixNew York Supreme Court · 1829

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rohan v. ProctorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. Neppach v. JordanOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Whalen v. GalyMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Pen-O-Tex Oil & Leasehold Co. v. Big Four Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API