Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1978No. 78-111Published

1DissentLocher, J.

This court has consistently affirmed the commission’s orders echoing that the function of this court is limited! on appeal, and the court must affirm the commission if the order is not unreasonable or unlawful. Cremean v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1976), 48 Ohio St. 2d 163; Western Reserve Transit v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1976), 47 Ohio St. 2d 32; Electrical Workers v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1974), 40 Ohio St. 2d 86; Mt. Vernon Telephone Corp. v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1955), 163 Ohio St. 381. The instant order of the commission, being neither unlawful nor unreasonable, should be affirmed.

In this cause, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cremean v. Public Utilities CommisionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Local 82, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Western Reserve Transit Authority v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API