Legal Opinion

Goodbar, White & Co. v. Out National Bank of Sulphur Springs

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1890No. 3234PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Hopkins. Tried below before Hon. E. W. Terhune.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

—The City National Bank of Sulphur Springs brought this action against A. B. Williamson on December 3, 1889, to recover $19,666.81 claimed and alleged to be due at different dates between that and March 4, 1890. Writ of attachment was sued out and levied on a stock of goods the property of Williamson.

Soon afterwards appellants, who were also creditors of Williamson, brought their several actions against him, sued out writs of attachment and caused them to be levied on the same goods, subject to the prior levy for appellee.

Appellants all reduced their claims to judgments…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bank v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Bullard v. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Bateman Bros. v. RamseyTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Howerton v. HoltTexas Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  2. Roberts v. StonehamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Tyson v. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Santa AnnaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Gottesman v. ToubinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Smith v. Citizens' Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API