Legal Opinion

Gammill v. Mullins

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 15, 1945No. 2516PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Justice.

J. W. Mullins and wife sued H. D. Gam-mill for damages suffered as the result of a collision between Mullins’ automobile and a truck belonging to Gammill, driven by Gam-mill’s servant or employee, Eugene Arnold. The case was submitted to a jury on special issues, all of which were answered favorably to plaintiffs-. Judgment was rendered on the verdict for plaintiffs, and defendant has appealed.

In answer to Issue number 1, the jury found that at the time of the collision Gam-mill’s employee was engaged in the scope of his employment. Special Issue number 19 was: "Do you find…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Simmonds v. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Simonds v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Sonnentheil v. Christian Moerlein Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Pope v. BeauchampTexas Supreme Court · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck and Company v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. Riverbend Country Club v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Texas Power & Light Co. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. MK Hall Company v. CaballeroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. LackeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API