Legal Opinion

Solargistic Corporation and Geodesco, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 11, 1991No. 89-3576PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, United States. The presence of a federal question provides the basis for subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The question presented is whether the United States improperly disclosed the plaintiffs’ “return information” in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 6103. We agree with the District Court’s conclusion that any alleged disclosure was authorized by a statutory exception to § 6103 and affirm the decision below.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The seeds of this lawsuit lie in an Internal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Cincinnati Tv 64 Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Mid-South Music Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. Robert J. Martin and Miriam D. Martin v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. Balanced Financial Management, Inc. v. FayDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cook Inc. v. Boston Scientific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. 3K Inv. Partners v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
  3. Emerging Money Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
  4. 3K Inv. Partners v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2009
  5. 3K Investment Partners, 3K Investments LLC, Tax Matters Partner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API