Legal Opinion

In re Ford Motor Co.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided February 8, 2012No. MDL No. 2316Published

1Opinion of the Court

*1376TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel: * Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiffs in the Northern District of Ohio Perko action seek centralization of this litigation in the Northern District of Ohio. Plaintiffs in the Central District of California and Southern District of Florida actions support centralization in the Central District of California. Common defendant Ford Motor Co. (Ford) opposes centralization.

This litigation currently consists of three actions pending in three districts, as listed on Schedule A. An additional, potentially related action is pending in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Denture Cream Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API