Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Huntington Ingalls Industries

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided October 16, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00281Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION LEO MCDONALD, JR. PLAINTIFF v. CAUSE NO. 1:18cv281-LG-RHW HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES DEFENDANT ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO TIMELY SERVE PROCESS BEFORE THE COURT is the [15] Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Huntington Ingalls Industries (“Industries”), which asserts that Plaintiff Leo McDonald, Jr., has failed to timely serve Industries, notwithstanding the repeated extensions this Court has granted him to do so. McDonald responds contending that he made repeated efforts to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Rufus M. Carimi v. Royal Carribean Cruise Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. Perez v. City of New OrleansDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API