Legal Opinion
Simon v. O'Toole
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 1, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Campbell, Lloyd, Bodine, Dear, Wells, JJ. 6.
For reversal — Parker, Case, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 5.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Kagan v. CaroselliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Slurzberg v. City of BayonneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Tumulty v. Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959