Legal Opinion

in Re Michael Sutton

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided April 24, 2008No. 02-08-00154-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-154-CV

IN RE MICHAEL SUTTON RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1)

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. (footnote: 2) Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

2Per curiam

PANEL A: LIVINGSTON, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and HOLMAN, J.

DELIVERED: April 24, 2008

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2:

See Wentworth v. Meyer…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re SanchezTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Wentworth v. MeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Rose v. City of La PorteTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In Re Jackson, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  5. City of La Porte v. State ex rel. RoseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API