Legal Opinion

BPH, INC. v. Cochrane

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 22, 1993No. AV93000013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peyton Cochrane, the tax collector for Tuscaloosa County, filed a complaint for declaratory judgment on behalf of Tuscaloosa County, seeking delinquent ad valorem taxes from BPH, Inc., and Luther Pate, IV. (We note that the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of Pate, who was a shareholder in both BPH and Dexter Hulsart Co., Inc. (Hulsart). Pate does not appeal any aspect of the trial court's determination.)

In his complaint, Cochrane alleged that no ad valorem taxes had been paid upon the property of Hulsart since the assessment of October 1, 1988, through the filing of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daniels v. BowersCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  2. Hamilton v. Walker County.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. J.N.H. v. N.T.H.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  2. STATE DEPT. OF REVENUE v. RobertsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  3. STATE DEPT. OF REVENUE v. RobertsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API