International Signal Co. v. Vreeland Apparatus Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Mantón, Circuit Judge, dissenting. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Suit in equity by the International Signal Company against the Vree-land Apparatus Company, Inc., and Frederick K. Vreeland. Decree for defendants, and complainant appeals.
1DissentManton, Circuit Judge
This is an appeal from a decree for the appellees, dismissing- a bill asking for equitable relief tinder section 4918. The appellant seeks to have the Vreeland patents, No. 1,239,852, granted September 11, 1917, for a receiver for electrical impulses, and No. 1,245,166, granted November 6, 1917, for method of transmitting and receiving high-frequency impulses as interfering under this statute with appellant’s Fessenden patent, No. 1,050,441, granted January 14, 1913, for electrical signaling apparatus, and patent No. 1,050,728, granted January 14, 1913, for method of signaling. It is sought…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boyd v. Janesville Hay Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Palmer Pneumatic Tire Co. v. LozierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Brooks v. SacksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1897
- Bird v. Elaborated Roofing Co. of BuffaloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- Benjamin Electric Mfg. Co. v. Northwestern Electric Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.