Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Stancil

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 13, 1987No. 1447PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

We are called upon to consider whether a defendant’s right to a speedy probation revocation hearing is enjoined where that hearing is held after the expiration of the probationary term and no reasons for a delay in holding the hearing are offered. We also must decide whether counsel was ineffective for failing to object to an unexplained delay in holding a probation revocation hearing. We find that Stancil’s right to a speedy revocation hearing was violated and that counsel was ineffective for failing to raise this objection.

On August 28, 1980, Stancil was found guilty of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. FloydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. MourarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. McCainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WrightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. MullinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. State v. HernandezNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Com. v. Green, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Com. v. Green, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API