In re Roach
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, J.,
delivering the opinion of the court:
■ The motion to set aside the sale made by the sheriff refers to the garage lot only. The petitioner first contends that the sale of this lot should be set aside for gross inadequacy of price because it was sold for $1,100, though worth $2,000. Whether this would constitute a sale for a grossly inadequate price within the rules laid down by this court (Cowen v. Stevens, 3 Harr. [Del.] 494; Booth’s Ex’r v. Webster, 5 Harr. [Del.] 129; Cowgill v. Cahoon, 3 Harr. [Del.] 23; Oldham v. Hossenger, 5 Houst. [Del.] 434; Broomall v. Reybold, 5 Houst.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cunningham v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Cohen v. MenardIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Mugge v. HelgemeierIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Ryerson v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1799
- McMullen v. GableIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lucerne Investment Co. v. Estate Belvedere, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1969
- In re Seaford Hardware Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1926
- One Pie Investments, LLC v. Kina Lane WhitfieldSuperior Court of Delaware · 2026