Legal Opinion

Wormer & Son v. Waterloo Agricultural Works

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1882PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Blade JETawle District Court. ActioN to foreclose a mortgage executed by tbe defendant corporation. Sobert Waller intervened, and seeks to have established a lien prior to that of the mortgage. The court found and entered judgment for the intervenor, and the plaintiff alone appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Seevers, Ch. J.

— As against the defendant, it was held in 50 Iowa, 262, that the plaintiff was entitled to a foreclosure of the mortgage. Two days prior to the jprocedendo being filed in the district court, Robert Waller intervened in the action by filing a petition, in which he claimed that the plaintiffs’ mortgage was junior to certain liens or interests he had in and to the mortgaged premises. The material facts upon which such claim is based are as follows: The premises had been sold under executions issued on judgments establishing mechanics’ liens thereon. These liens were prior to that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McNew's Executors v. RogersTennessee Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Kitchell v. MudgettMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Gilbert v. GilbertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  4. Wormer & Sons v. Waterloo Agricultural WorksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Crippen v. ChappelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. Fort Dodge Building & Loan Ass'n v. ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
  3. Mather v. JenswoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  4. Bennett v. First National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. National Life Insurance v. AyresSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API