Legal Opinion

United States v. Brogren

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 13, 1945No. Criminal Nos. 16979, 16826, 16774, 16899, 16902, 16924, 16925, 16729, 16740, 16934, 16941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALEY, District Judge.

The defendants McDevitt, Welch and the others, have been indicted for the substantive offense of causing to be made and presented for payment and approval, to an officer in the naval service of the United States, claims upon and against the Navy Department of the United States of Ameri-ca, which claims the defendants knew to be false, fictitious and fraudulent.

The defendants have all filed demurrers to the respective indictments against them, all based on the same grounds.

The indictments make substantially the following allegations:

That the Bethlehem-Hingham Shipyard,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. HutchesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Frisbie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GillMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1977
  2. United States v. GicintoDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API