Jackpine Gypsies Motorcycle Club v. South Dakota Department of Revenue
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentHertz, Acting Justice
I dissent.
I would hold that by adopting its 1984 budget, containing line item expenses for the Classic, that this is an official act of the City of Sturgis, and constituted “official sponsorship” of the Classic as required by SDCL 10-45-13(3).
The majority interprets the requirements of the words “official sponsorship” to mean an express resolution specifically declaring the sponsorship. This interpretation, in my opinion, is too narrow and not contemplated by the statute. The legislature, in passing this statute, simply intended that the city demonstrate its sponsorship by some official…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lindahl v. Independent School District No. 306Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- C. A. Wagner Construction Co. v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
- Application of Leo's Bus Service, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Orme v. Lendahand Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942