Legal Opinion
United States v. French
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided May 5, 1976No. Crim. 76-76-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO SUPPRESS OF DEFENDANTS JACOBS AND BRUTICO
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
Defendants Jacobs and Brutico have moved this court to enter an order suppressing certain evidence pursuant to Rule 41 and Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, on the ground that said evidence was the poisoned fruit of at least two illegal searches. On April 29, 1976, the court conducted an evidentiary hearing and based upon the evidence adduced therein finds the essential facts controlling the controversy are that on October 11, 1975, an agent of the Drug Enforcement Administration acting in an…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Leonard Joel DubrofskyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Earna Jean Pringle and Harold ElstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Dale David Bruneau, United States of America v. Jeffrey Charles KohnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- State v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- United States v. CassityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985