Legal Opinion

Sullivan Savings Institution v. Copeland

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 5, 1887PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Fremont Circuit Court. Action in chancery to foreclose a mortgage. There was a a decree for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

1. usury : who may plead : grantee of mortgagor. I. The action, was originally brought against Oopeland, the mortgagor, and Brewer, to whom he had sold and conveyed the land. The defendants united hi an answer, setting up as a defense usury in note anq mortgage. When the cause was called forbearing, it was dismissed as to defendant'Oopeland, the mortgagor. Thereafter the answer in the case was in fact the answer of Brewer alone, as there was no other defendant in the case; and the defense of usury was therefore pleaded by him alone, the mortgagor being out of the case. It is the settled rule…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  2. Burlington Mutual Loan Ass'n v. HeiderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  3. National Life Insurance v. OlmstedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Spinney v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  2. In re WorthDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1904
  3. Partch v. KrogmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  4. Anderson v. Oregon Mortgage Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Knight v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API