Legal Opinion

Butter v. Burmeister

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

Upon this appeal it is contended that the trial court was in error in three respects :(1) In determining- that George A. Burmeister, Marvin Burmeister, and Harold C. Burmeister and the after-born children of Alma Burmeister were “the parties entitled thereto absolutely.”

(2 ) The trial court erred in determining that the remainder of the one third of the residuary estate composing the corpus of the Alma Burmeister trust limited to a special class, namely, the surviving children of the life tenant, Alma Burmeister, reaching respectively thirty years of age, was valid and did not violate the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Becker v. ChesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Holmes v. WalterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Roth v. KarstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Baker v. SternWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Will of WehrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Harris v. BurgerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API