Butter v. Burmeister
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
Upon this appeal it is contended that the trial court was in error in three respects :(1) In determining- that George A. Burmeister, Marvin Burmeister, and Harold C. Burmeister and the after-born children of Alma Burmeister were “the parties entitled thereto absolutely.”
(2 ) The trial court erred in determining that the remainder of the one third of the residuary estate composing the corpus of the Alma Burmeister trust limited to a special class, namely, the surviving children of the life tenant, Alma Burmeister, reaching respectively thirty years of age, was valid and did not violate the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Becker v. ChesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Holmes v. WalterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Roth v. KarstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Baker v. SternWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- Will of WehrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Harris v. BurgerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950