Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Lincoln Mutual Casualty Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1938No. Docket No. 136, Calendar No. 40,045PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBtjtzel, J.

After plaintiff recovered a judgment against the principal defendant for injuries resulting from an automobile accident, he sued out a writ of garnishment against the garnishee insurance company, the appellant herein, who had insured the principal defendant. The garnishee defendant denied liability because of the clause in the policy stating:

‘ ‘ The company shall not be liable while any automobile herein covered is used, operated, manipulated or maintained * * * (c) while being used for the transportation of passengers for a consideration, actual or implied.”

Testimony taken in the principal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pietrantonio v. Travelers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HearnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Crowell v. Maryland Motor Car InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Commercial Union Assur. Co. of London v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Standard Accident Insurance v. CloutierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API