Legal Opinion
In Re Bell & Beckwith
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 25, 1984No. 19-60244PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD L. SPEER, Bankruptcy Judge.
This cause comes before the Court upon the Motion for in camera Review and Preservation Under Seal of Certain Hearing Exhibits. The Court has reviewed both the written and oral arguments offered by counsel on behalf of the Motion. Based upon that review and for the following reasons the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED.
FACTS
The Movant is the Trustee for the liquidation of the Debtor-brokerage under the provisions of 15 U.S.C. § 78aaa et seq. The Trustee’s liquidation efforts have resulted in an accumulation of funds…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gitto v. Worcester Telegram & Gazette Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- In Re Food Management Group, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In Re Analytical Systems, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1987
- In Re Bell & BeckwithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
- In Re Borders Group, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.