People v. Mills
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
“When a defendant pleads not guilty by reason of insanity, and also joins with it another plea or pleas, the defendant shall first be tried as if only such other plea or pleas had been entered, and in that trial the defendant shall be conclusively presumed to have been sane at the time the offense is alleged to have been committed.” (Pen. Code, § 1026, subd. (a).) In this case defendant was charged with murder, pled not guilty, and also raised an insanity defense. At the guilt phase trial, the prosecutor requested a jury instruction that defendant was conclusively presumed…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. CovarrubiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. DeHoyosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. ElmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. DeboseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.