Legal Opinion

Fetty v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1997No. S97A0835PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Justice.

Appellant Jason Fetty alleges that numerous purported instances of error concerning the procedural and evidentiary aspects of his criminal trial mandate the reversal of his convictions for malice murder, aggravated assault, and burglary. Upon review of the record, we find that the trial court erred by failing to merge Fetty’s conviction for aggravated assault with his conviction for malice murder, and thus the conviction and sentence for the assault must be set aside as a matter of law. We need not decide whether the trial court erred by admitting certain hearsay testimony…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  5. Gunter v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Parrish v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  2. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  3. Sharpe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  4. Bridges v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  5. Streater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API