Legal Opinion

Beetz v. Strobel

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided January 15, 1897Published

Heard on motion for judgment non obstante vredicto.

1Opinion of the CourtJelke, J.

Plaintiff originally filed his petition'here in setting out two cases of action :

1. On a contract.

2. For use and occupation.

On motion of defendant, and order of court, plaintiff struck the second cause of action cut of his petition, so that at the time of going to trial the petition stood as an action for rent on a contract.

At the conclusion of the first trial, and before going to trial for the second time, defendant filed by leave an amended answer, a narrative sort of pleading, containing a general denial, setting up the “statute of frauds,’’and in addition thereto stating facts which, if…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API