Bloomingdale v. Hodges
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
• Appeal by defendant Hodges from affirmance by the City Court," General Term, of a judgment in favor of plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.
The defendants agreed that if Bloomingdale Brothers would-procure for them a contract with F. F. Proctor to- do certain decorating and other work upon the cafe and passages of the theatre known as Proctor’s Pleasure Palace, the defendants' would pay ten per cent, of the gross amount realized from said *7work to Bloomingdale Brothers. The latter firm thereupon introduced the defendants to Proctor, and through its agency a contract was made whereby the defendants were to do the work for $6,000. The work was done, and the $6,000 paid to the defendants, who thereafter declined to pay the brokerage.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Magee v. OddenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Weber v. Wittmer Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1935