Legal Opinion

United States v. Christopher Barry Greer, Daniel Alvis Wood, Sean Christian Tarrant, Michael Lewis Lawrence, and Lance Jon Jordan

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1992No. 90-1348PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Per curiam

This case was taken en banc to review issues concerning jury selection discussed in part II of the panel opinion. See United States v. Greer, 939 F.2d 1076, 1084-86 (5th Cir.), vacated for rehearing en banc, 948 F.2d 934 (5th Cir.1991). Except as to part II, we reinstate the panel opinion. As relates to the issues in part II, the court unanimously holds that the district court did not err in refusing to strike for cause all blacks, Hispanics, and Jewish jurors. Otherwise, as a consequence of an equally divided court the actions and decisions of the district court, as discussed in part II, and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Joe Mario Trevino, Jr. v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Fisher v. State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. NealCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. State v. AikinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. United States v. SteenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API