Dunn v. Peterson
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County. The facts in this case are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoyt, J. —
This is substantially an action of ejectment. From the complaint it appears that plaintiff is the sole devisee of the owner of an undivided one-half of the land therein described; and that thewill under which sheelaims had been recently admitted to probate, as a foreign will, in the county in which such land is situated. In the paragraph relating to the probating of such will there is no allegation that letters testamentary or of administration with will annexed were not issued, nor is such fact anywhere alleged in said complaint. Under these…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Meeks v. HahnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Meeks v. KirbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by2 opinions
- Griffin v. WarburtonWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Hazelton v. BogardusWashington Supreme Court · 1894