Legal Opinion
McNab v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided December 5, 1997No. IP 94-1560 C B/SPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BARKER, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) claims that Defendants (1) arbitrarily and capriciously denied Plaintiffs early retirement benefits, (2) breached their fiduciary duty by failing to notify Plaintiffs of amendments to the early retirement plan, and (3) engaged in unlawful discrimination by denying Plaintiffs participation in the early retirement plan. For the reasons explained below, Defendants’ Motion…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- John Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin and Aurora Health Care, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Nancy Wolf v. City of Fitchburg and G. Jean SeilingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Albert C. McNAB, Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Campbell v. BankBoston, N.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002