Legal Opinion

Litsky v. Fulton Operating Corp.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 7, 1947Published

1Opinion of the CourtBoneparth, J.

Motion by judgment debtor to vacate subpoenas in supplementary proceedings, heretofore served upon the judgment debtor and upon the National Bronx Bank, as a *399third party, containing the usual restraining provisions. The subpoenas were based upon a judgment rendered in the Municipal Court, Bronx County, against the Fulton Operating Corp., on April 1,1947.

After the service of the subpoenas and on April 14, 1947, the judgment debtor served and filed a notice of appeal from that judgment and also filed a surety company undertaking on appeal, in twice the amount of the judgment, as provided by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crane v. BeecherNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hyman v. SegalAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
  3. In re the Examination of the First National Bank of EarlvilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API