Legal Opinion
Cielo Arevalo v. Walmart Inc., Christopher Cruz, and Does 1 through 100
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 25, 2026No. 2:26-cv-02432Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 JS-6 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CIELO AREVALO, Case No. 2:26-cv-02432-SPG-AS 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 12 v. MOTION TO REMAND [ECF NO. 8] 13 14 WALMART INC., a Delaware Corporation; CHRISTOPHER CRUZ, an 15 individual; and DOES 1 through 100, 16 inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Before the Court is the Motion to Remand, (ECF No. 8 (“Motion”)), filed by Plaintiff 20 Cielo Arevalo (“Plaintiff”). The Court has read and considered the Motion and concluded 21 that it is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hamilton Materials, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.