Legal Opinion

Harp v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided October 14, 1963No. Civ. No. 63-286PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILKENNY, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court on the ■defendant’s motion for a summary judgment. The action is for loss of consortium by the surviving husband in ■connection with the claimed wrongful ■death of his wife.

The record discloses that Mrs. Harp was electrocuted and that her death was instantaneous or practically so. The ■only evidence that she lived any period of time after the original electrical contact is contained in the Death Certificate where the Deputy Coroner certified that she may have lived “seconds” after the primary contact.

The authorities seem to be in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lampe v. Lagomarcino-Grupe CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  2. Walden v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Lane v. SteinigerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Elling v. Blake-McFall Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. West v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ledger v. TippittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Ledger v. TippittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API