Armstrong v. Sensormatic/ADT
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered December 23, 2010, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs deposition testimony and averments contained in *493an affidavit submitted in opposition to defendant’s motion are too ambiguous to raise an issue of fact as to whether he had engaged in a protected activity by complaining of preferential treatment towards women, or was terminated in retaliation for that allegedly protected conduct (see Forrest v Jewish Guild for the Blind, 3 NY3d 295, 313…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Forrest v. Jewish Guild for the BlindNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- KAREN VAN ZANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES; And Kenneth Hasan King, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Adamantia Pollis v. The New School for Social ResearchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- International Healthcare Exchange, Inc. v. Global Healthcare Exchange, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Bendeck v. NYU Hospitals CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hudson v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Suri v. Grey Global Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Suri v. Grey Global Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Ellison v. Chartis Claims, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Mira v. HarderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.