Legal Opinion

Bautista v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 1992No. WD 46026PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FENNER, Presiding Judge.

Appellant, Francisco Bautista, appeals the judgment of the trial court finding that the suspension or revocation of his driver’s license was authorized as required by Sections 302.500 through 302.540, RSMo 1986, upon the court’s finding of probable cause to believe that Bautista was driving with alcohol concentration in his blood at .13 per cent or more by weight. Bautista argues on appeal that the trial court erred in admitting the results of the breath analysis test administered to him.

A Breathalyzer Model 900A was used to administer a breath analysis test to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shine v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Young v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Leach v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Endsley v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Hatfield v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Canania v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Dillon v. Director of Revenue, StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Victor M. Nix v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API