Legal Opinion

Bending v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1904No. Docket No. 25PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Ontonagon; Haire, J. Petition by Ferdinand Bending against Perry F. Powers, auditor general, Charles H. Chick, and the Diamond Match Company to set aside the decree and sales of certain lands delinquent for the taxes of 1892, 1893, and 1894. From a decree dismissing the petition, petitioner appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

The circuit judge, in disposing of this case, filed a written opinion, which contains a concise statement of the questions involved. It is as follows:

“Facts.
“ In this cause petitioner, Bending, asks the court to vacate and set aside the decrees and the sales thereunder made on certain lands in Ontonagon county for the years 1892, 1893, and 1894. The land is described as the southwest quarter of section seventeen (17), town forty-eight (48) north, of range thirty-eight (38) west. Petitioner claims that the tax decrees and sales for the above-named years were void. The Diamond Match Company and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peninsular Savings Bank v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Spaulding v. O'ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Brewer v. DodgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Aztec Copper Co. v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holmes v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Owens v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Butters v. ButtersMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. McFarlane v. SimpsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Platz v. EnglehardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API