Legal Opinion

Cox v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 25, 1992No. 190 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, President Judge.

Claimant Robert Cox appeals an order of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board that affirmed a referee’s decision that granted the petition of Otis Elevator (employer), through which the employer sought to recover money the claimant received in a third-party action, based on the employer’s asserted subrogation rights, under section 319 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 671.

The issues the claimant raises in this appeal are: (1) whether the referee had jurisdiction to order claimant’s counsel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ward v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. PMA Insurance Group v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Monessen, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API