Legal Opinion

Lazarus v. Hagensick

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 26, 1972No. 55235PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE McGLOON

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff company filed suit against defendants charging tortious interference with certain contracts. A jury was selected, and trial commenced. Upon completion of plaintiffs opening statement, the trial court invited defendants to move for what it referred to as a directed verdict. They did so, and the trial court granted the motion and dismissed plaintiffs complaint on the grounds that no cause of action had been stated by plaintiffs complaint or opening statement. Plaintiff appeals this dismissal.

We reverse and remand.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Petersen v. General Rug & Carpet Cleaners, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  2. Pietsch v. PietschIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Home Mutual Insurance v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
  4. Tanner v. SolomonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  5. Howard v. Reserve InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dan Hayes Boiler & Repair Co. v. Illinois Masonic Medical CenterAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. People v. HintzeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Cherny v. FuentesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API