Legal Opinion
Nunez v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 28, 1972No. 2 CA-CIV 1299PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge.
This petition for special action arises out of an information filed in Superior Court against the petitioner alleging violations of A.R.S. § 13-1092. Petitioner moved to quash the information on several grounds including that of failure to charge an offense. The motion was denied whereupon petitioner sought relief in this court. Since appellate intervention by way of special action is appropriate to review an erroneous denial of a motion to quash, see Abbey v. City Court of the City of Tucson, 7 Ariz.App. 330, 439 P.2d 302 (1968), we assume jurisdiction.
A.R.S. § 13-1092 provides:
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Police Pension Board of City of Phoenix v. WarrenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- TUCSON PUB. SCH., DIST. NO. 1 OF PIMA CO. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- State v. WaymanArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Lucy Webb Hayes National Training School for Deaconesses & Missionaries v. GeogheganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BartusekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Sullivan v. Green Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1998
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1998