Legal Opinion

Chicago Ins. v. Graham & Morton Transp. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 22, 1901No. 691PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

1Per curiam

We are content with our conclusion upon the merits, as declared. 108 Fed. 271. It is now urged that we have not provided for the payment of interest from the date of the filing of the libel upon the amount which may be found due the libelant upon the policy of insurance as we have construed it. The question of interest was not suggested at the bar, and was not considered by the court. Nothing in the opinion contained prevents the court below from the allowance of interest if it be so advised, and if it be consonant with the law and the fact so to do, — a question with which we are not now…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chicago Ins. Co. v. Graham & Morton Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marine Ins. v. Graham & Morton Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API