Cruse v. Guzik
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BOLIN, Judge.
Mrs. Theo Dixon Guzik, the daughter of Mrs. Vada Mae Dixon, instituted this action to have declared invalid an olographic will, alleging the testament had been made at a time when testatrix was mentally incompetent. The will named as sole legatee and executrix Mrs. Elizabeth Christine Dixon (now Mrs. Cruse), widow of a deceased son of the testatrix. The will was admitted to probate on the petition of Mrs. Cruse, who now defends this action. From judgment decreeing the invalidity of the will Mrs. Cruse prosecutes this appeal. We affirm the judgment of the lower court.
The property…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Succession of MithoffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
- Rostrup v. Succession of SpicerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Succession of HersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Artigue v. ArtigueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
3Cited by4 opinions
- Succession of KilpatrickLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Succession of KellyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Succession of MonteroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Succession of CatanzaroLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982