O'QUINN v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sognier, Judge.
George and David O’Quinn were convicted in a common trial with James L. Hutcheson, Jr., of burglary and on appeal they enumerate four errors. First, that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support the verdict; second, that the trial court erred in allowing, over objection, the testimony of Sheriff Wainwright regarding his observations of the conduct and actions of a bloodhound; third, that the trial court erred in admitting, over objection, prosecution Exhibit 3, a certificate of discharge of George O’Quinn, issued by the Florida Division of Corrections; and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Riley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Pedigo v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
- Sprouse v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- MacH v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Rutland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Muckle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Fitz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Hazelrig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Willis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.