Legal Opinion

O'QUINN v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1980No. 58728, 58729PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

George and David O’Quinn were convicted in a common trial with James L. Hutcheson, Jr., of burglary and on appeal they enumerate four errors. First, that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support the verdict; second, that the trial court erred in allowing, over objection, the testimony of Sheriff Wainwright regarding his observations of the conduct and actions of a bloodhound; third, that the trial court erred in admitting, over objection, prosecution Exhibit 3, a certificate of discharge of George O’Quinn, issued by the Florida Division of Corrections; and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Riley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Pedigo v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Sprouse v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  4. MacH v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. Rutland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Muckle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Fitz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Hazelrig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Willis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API