Legal Opinion

City of Hollywood v. Bair

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 31, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case was before us on petition for rehearing granted for the purpose of considering two motions filed in this Court by the defendant in error. The first motion referred to was filed on July 25, 1936, and was to affirm the cause or quash or dismiss the writ of error, because the brief of the plaintiff in error, City of Hollywood, did not comply with Rule 20 as amended.

The other motion was filed August 6th, 1936, and moved to strike the brief of O.W. Collins, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Orville W. Collins and to affirm the judgment or dismiss the writ of error because the brief of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Bank v. ColbySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Pendleton v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Nelson v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  4. Venable Bros. v. Southern Granite Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Marion Phosphate Co. v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perry v. ShawSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  2. Pollock v. T & M INVESTMENTS, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Haitian Ventures, Inc. v. WisniewskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Ainsley Realty Co. v. KramerSupreme Court of Florida · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API